UHC Forum is a coalition of health sector practitioners, advocates and academics dedicated to a strategic push on the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda. UHC Forum Health Debates is one of its flagship activities carried out in partnership with the Power and Participation Research Centre (PPRC). This op-ed is derived from the health debate on the Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) modality adopted for health sector planning and implementation since 1998.

The Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp), introduced in Bangladesh in the late 1990s, sought to improve the health sector by uniting the efforts of government, donors, and NGOs under a unified national plan. The strategy proved effective in several areas—enhancing coordination, reducing duplication and ensuring more efficient use of resources. It fostered a government-led approach, empowering the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) to take ownership of health programmes and make decisions that align with national priorities.

The pooling of funds from various donors simplified financial management and allowed for a more harmonised implementation of health services. Moreover, SWAp contributed to capacity building by strengthening institutional frameworks, enhancing local expertise, and promoting evidence-based policymaking. However, SWAp also faced substantial challenges. Key stakeholders, such as the private sector and the Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, were excluded from planning processes, limiting its scope and effectiveness. Centralised decision-making created bureaucratic delays, slowing programme implementation. Additionally, larger donors, such as the World Bank, exerted disproportionate influence, at times, prioritising global agendas over local needs. The risk of mismanagement also grew as pooled funding lacked adequate oversight and accountability mechanisms.